Michael Kugelman elucidates the current political state of South Asia, particularly developments in hate speech, populism, and regional political relations.
Tristen Naylor considers the English School research agenda, his theory of ‘international social closure’, global governance, and fieldwork at the G20 and G7.
Naylor’s framework analyses how state and non-state actors compete for status within international society by focusing on social division, stratification and closure.
Tomohiko Taniguchi shares his views on Japan’s global standing, its foreign relations with the EU and its Northeast neighbours, and the impact of ‘Abenomics’ policies.
In the name of the dream of global relevance in the future, Brazilian leaders often ends up forgetting to rule in the name of people’s well-being in the present.
Jumping on the bandwagon of demonizing crowds does not quite get to the point of violent protests and their causes.
Although his critique of the UN is problematic, Kirton’s book remains an important contribution based on a solid foundation of political theory and empirical knowledge.
By being one of the few scholarly texts to focus on the MIKTA, Jongryn’s edited volume is a substantial contribution to global governance literature.
Hajnal has penned a richly documented and well designed book which proves to be one of the best guides to an incredibly important institution of global governance.
The culture of protests has become a common sight in all G20 summits, so much so that preventing violent activism has become an inevitable part of the security planning.
